Filed: Mar. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2407 TIMOTHY GRIFFIN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:13-cv-00346-GCM) Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 12, 2014 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2407 TIMOTHY GRIFFIN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:13-cv-00346-GCM) Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 12, 2014 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2407 TIMOTHY GRIFFIN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:13-cv-00346-GCM) Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 12, 2014 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Wayne Knapp, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Timothy Griffin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on Griffin’s motion to vacate an arbitration award. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffin v. U-Haul Int’l Inc., No. 3:13-cv-00346-GCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2