Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

James Reedom v. Carolyn Colvin, 13-2423 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-2423 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2423 JAMES PATRICK REEDOM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:13-cv-02305-RDB) Submitted: March 27, 2014 Decided: March 31, 2014 Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2423 JAMES PATRICK REEDOM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:13-cv-02305-RDB) Submitted: March 27, 2014 Decided: March 31, 2014 Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Patrick Reedom, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Craig Ormson, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Patrick Reedom appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reedom v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv-02305-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer