Filed: May 22, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7942 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SEAN JEROME ESCOFFERY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:98-cr-00126-BO-1) Submitted: May 13, 2014 Decided: May 22, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sean Jerome Escoffery,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7942 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SEAN JEROME ESCOFFERY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:98-cr-00126-BO-1) Submitted: May 13, 2014 Decided: May 22, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sean Jerome Escoffery, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7942 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SEAN JEROME ESCOFFERY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:98-cr-00126-BO-1) Submitted: May 13, 2014 Decided: May 22, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sean Jerome Escoffery, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant United States Attorney, Shailika K. Shah, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sean Jerome Escoffery appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Escoffery, No. 5:98-cr-00126-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
