Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Beattie Ashmore v. Dennis Richardson, 13-2519 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-2519 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 27, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2519 BEATTIE BALENTINE ASHMORE, in his capacity as Court Appointed Receiver for The Three Hebrew Boys, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DENNIS RICHARDSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00431-MBS) Submitted: April 28, 2014 Decided: May 27, 2014 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Se
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2519 BEATTIE BALENTINE ASHMORE, in his capacity as Court Appointed Receiver for The Three Hebrew Boys, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DENNIS RICHARDSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00431-MBS) Submitted: April 28, 2014 Decided: May 27, 2014 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Lewis Walter Tollison, III, TOLLISON LAW FIRM, Greenville, South Carolina; Thomas Edward Vanderbloemen, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis Richardson appeals the district court’s orders granting a preliminary injunction and summary judgment to Ashmore. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ashmore v. Richardson, No. 3:12-cv-00431-MBS (D.S.C. filed Nov. 18, 2013 & entered Nov. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer