Filed: May 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6138 WILLIAM L. CHANDLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. B. J. ROBERTS, Sheriff, Defendant – Appellee, and GEORGE M. ROGERS, III, Attorney at Law; ANTHON BELL, Commonwealth Attorney, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HA
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6138 WILLIAM L. CHANDLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. B. J. ROBERTS, Sheriff, Defendant – Appellee, and GEORGE M. ROGERS, III, Attorney at Law; ANTHON BELL, Commonwealth Attorney, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAM..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6138
WILLIAM L. CHANDLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
B. J. ROBERTS, Sheriff,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
GEORGE M. ROGERS, III, Attorney at Law; ANTHON BELL,
Commonwealth Attorney,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD)
Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William L. Chandler, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence
Dumville, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William L. Chandler appeals the district court’s
orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012), and he has filed a motion to
proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Chandler’s
motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district
court’s orders. Chandler v. Roberts, No. 1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD
(E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2013; Dec. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2