Filed: May 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6137 SCOTT LEWIS RENDELMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03140-JKB; 8:07-cr-00331-JKB-1) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. * Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6137 SCOTT LEWIS RENDELMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03140-JKB; 8:07-cr-00331-JKB-1) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. * Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6137
SCOTT LEWIS RENDELMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-03140-JKB; 8:07-cr-00331-JKB-1)
Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. ∗
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott Lewis Rendelman, Appellant Pro Se. Sujit Raman, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
∗
The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 46(d) (2012).
PER CURIAM:
Scott Rendelman appeals the district court’s order
granting in part his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion for return of
seized property. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. Rendelman v. United States, Nos. 1:13-cv-03140-JKB;
8:07-cr-00331-JKB-1 (D. Md. filed Jan. 10 & entered Jan. 13,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2