Filed: May 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6231 MICHAEL T. SCOTT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. PHILLIP MORGAN, Warden; DIVISION OF CORRECTION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01098-RDB) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6231 MICHAEL T. SCOTT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. PHILLIP MORGAN, Warden; DIVISION OF CORRECTION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01098-RDB) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6231
MICHAEL T. SCOTT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. PHILLIP MORGAN, Warden; DIVISION OF CORRECTION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-01098-RDB)
Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael T. Scott, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-
Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael T. Scott, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order granting Defendants summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) action against them. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Scott v. Morgan, No. 1:13-cv-01098-RDB
(D. Md. filed Jan. 13, 2014; entered Jan. 14, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2