Filed: May 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6429 HARVEY LEE HAYES, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOEL ZIEGLER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00261) Submitted: May 27, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harvey Lee Hayes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John F
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6429 HARVEY LEE HAYES, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOEL ZIEGLER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00261) Submitted: May 27, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harvey Lee Hayes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Fu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6429
HARVEY LEE HAYES, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JOEL ZIEGLER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00261)
Submitted: May 27, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harvey Lee Hayes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Fulton Gianola,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Harvey Lee Hayes, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Hayes v. Ziegler, No. 5:11-cv-00261 (S.D.W.
Va. Feb. 20 & 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2