Filed: Jun. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6025 WYATT HESSING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GARY P. BRUNELLE, Police Officer; ERICCA FIGUEROA, Police Officer; JOSEPH GUZDOWSKI, Police Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:13-cv-00595-HEH) Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6025 WYATT HESSING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GARY P. BRUNELLE, Police Officer; ERICCA FIGUEROA, Police Officer; JOSEPH GUZDOWSKI, Police Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:13-cv-00595-HEH) Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by u..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6025
WYATT HESSING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GARY P. BRUNELLE, Police Officer; ERICCA FIGUEROA, Police
Officer; JOSEPH GUZDOWSKI, Police Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:13-cv-00595-HEH)
Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wyatt Hessing, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wyatt Hessing appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action without prejudice
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), for failure to comply with a prior
court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Hessing v. Brunelle, No. 3:13-cv-00595-HEH
(E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2