Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Luria Greene v. US Department of Education, 14-1006 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1006 Visitors: 67
Filed: Jun. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1006 LURIA NICOLE GREENE, Debtor - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant – Appellee, and CLARA P. SWANSON, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:13-cv-00079-RGD-LRL) Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished pe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1006 LURIA NICOLE GREENE, Debtor - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant – Appellee, and CLARA P. SWANSON, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:13-cv-00079-RGD-LRL) Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Luria Nicole Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory David Stefan, Susan Lynn Watt, Assistant United States Attorneys, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Luria Nicole Greene appeals from the district court’s orders upholding the bankruptcy court’s determination that her student loan debt is not dischargeable in her bankruptcy case and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Greene v. Dep’t of Educ., No. 4:13-cv-00079-RGD-LRL (E.D. Va. Oct. 2, 2013; filed Oct. 25, 2013 & entered Oct. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer