Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6356 LUIS A. VELARDE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN MCDONALD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:12-ct-03222-D) Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Luis Armando Velarde, Appellant Pro Se. P
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6356 LUIS A. VELARDE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN MCDONALD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:12-ct-03222-D) Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Luis Armando Velarde, Appellant Pro Se. Pe..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6356
LUIS A. VELARDE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN MCDONALD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:12-ct-03222-D)
Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luis Armando Velarde, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Luis Armando Velarde appeals the district court’s
order granting John McDonald’s motion for summary judgment and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action for
failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Velarde v.
McDonald, No. 5:12-ct-03222-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2