Filed: Mar. 17, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2409 In Re: HENRY EARL MILLER, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:04-cr-00022-HFF; 6:06-cv-00548-HFF; 6:09-cv-01150-HFF) Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 17, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Henry Earl Miller petition
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2409 In Re: HENRY EARL MILLER, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:04-cr-00022-HFF; 6:06-cv-00548-HFF; 6:09-cv-01150-HFF) Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 17, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Henry Earl Miller petitions..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2409 In Re: HENRY EARL MILLER, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:04-cr-00022-HFF; 6:06-cv-00548-HFF; 6:09-cv-01150-HFF) Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 17, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motions filed asserting that his conviction is a violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket sheets reveals that the district court denied the motions in text orders on December 29, 2009. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Miller’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
