Filed: Jul. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2415 MCELROY COAL COMPANY; CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, Petitioners, v. MIKEL C. TRADER; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (12-0658-BLA) Submitted: June 30, 2014 Decided: July 11, 2014 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William S. M
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2415 MCELROY COAL COMPANY; CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, Petitioners, v. MIKEL C. TRADER; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (12-0658-BLA) Submitted: June 30, 2014 Decided: July 11, 2014 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William S. Ma..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2415
MCELROY COAL COMPANY; CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY,
Petitioners,
v.
MIKEL C. TRADER; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(12-0658-BLA)
Submitted: June 30, 2014 Decided: July 11, 2014
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William S. Mattingly, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Morgantown, West
Virginia, for Petitioners. Heath M. Long, PAWLOWSKI, BILONICK &
LONG, Ebensburg, Pennsylvania; Jeffrey Steven Goldberg, Gary K.
Stearman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.,
for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
McElroy Coal Company and Consolidation Coal Company
petition for review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and
order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black
lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our
review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses
that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and
is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition
for review for the reasons stated by the Board. McElroy Coal
Co. v. Trader, No. 12-0658-BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 24, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2