Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sparkle Thompson v. Carolyn Colvin, 13-2374 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-2374 Visitors: 63
Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2374 SPARKLE THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00399-GCM-DCK) Submitted: June 30, 2014 Decided: July 30, 2014 Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2374 SPARKLE THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00399-GCM-DCK) Submitted: June 30, 2014 Decided: July 30, 2014 Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David J. Cortes, ROBERTI, WITTENBERG, LAUFFER, WICKER & CINSKI, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Lucy A. Bezdek, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sparkle Thompson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Thompson’s application for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Thompson v. Colvin, No. 3:12-cv-00399-GCM-DCK (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 10, 2013; entered Sept. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer