Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

David Ruby v. Mykal Ryan, 14-1314 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1314 Visitors: 54
Filed: Sep. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1314 In re: MYKAL S. RYAN, Debtor, - DAVID R. RUBY, Plaintiff – Appellee, KELLY M. BARNHART, Party-in-Interest – Appellee, v. MYKAL S. RYAN, Debtor – Appellant, and HELEN E. RYAN, Defendant. and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (4:13-cv-00069-MSD-TEM) Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: Septembe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1314 In re: MYKAL S. RYAN, Debtor, ------------------------------------ DAVID R. RUBY, Plaintiff – Appellee, KELLY M. BARNHART, Party-in-Interest – Appellee, v. MYKAL S. RYAN, Debtor – Appellant, and HELEN E. RYAN, Defendant. and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (4:13-cv-00069-MSD-TEM) Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 2, 2014 Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mykal S. Ryan, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly M. Barnhart, ROUSSOS LASSITER GLANZER & BARNHART, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Mykal S. Ryan appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting Ryan’s request for leave to file certain motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruby v. Ryan, No. 4:13- cv-00069-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer