Filed: Sep. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6637 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID ISSAC WORRELL, a/k/a David Patrick Worrell, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00049-H-1) Submitted: September 9, 2014 Decided: September 11, 2014 Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6637 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID ISSAC WORRELL, a/k/a David Patrick Worrell, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00049-H-1) Submitted: September 9, 2014 Decided: September 11, 2014 Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. A..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6637 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID ISSAC WORRELL, a/k/a David Patrick Worrell, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00049-H-1) Submitted: September 9, 2014 Decided: September 11, 2014 Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Issac Worrell, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Issac Worrell appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motions in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Worrell, No. 4:03-cr-00049-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
