In Re: Robert Bailey v., 14-1738 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 14-1738
Visitors: 22
Filed: Sep. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1738 In re: ROBERT GENE BAILEY, Petitioner. On Petition for Extraordinary Writ. Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 25, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Gene Bailey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Gene Bailey has filed a petition f
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1738 In re: ROBERT GENE BAILEY, Petitioner. On Petition for Extraordinary Writ. Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 25, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Gene Bailey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Gene Bailey has filed a petition fo..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1738 In re: ROBERT GENE BAILEY, Petitioner. On Petition for Extraordinary Writ. Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 25, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Gene Bailey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Gene Bailey has filed a petition for an extraordinary writ pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. We have reviewed the petition and conclude that his request is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his petition for an extraordinary writ. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Source: CourtListener
