Filed: Sep. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6893 ADRIAN NATHANIEL BACON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. C/O MICHAEL WOOD; C/O WEBB; C/O C. ROSE; C/O K. BRINKLEY; C/O WHITE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, James P. Jones, District Judges. (7:13-cv-00565-JPJ-RSB) Submitted: September 19, 2014 Decided: September 25, 2014 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dis
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6893 ADRIAN NATHANIEL BACON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. C/O MICHAEL WOOD; C/O WEBB; C/O C. ROSE; C/O K. BRINKLEY; C/O WHITE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, James P. Jones, District Judges. (7:13-cv-00565-JPJ-RSB) Submitted: September 19, 2014 Decided: September 25, 2014 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dism..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6893
ADRIAN NATHANIEL BACON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C/O MICHAEL WOOD; C/O WEBB; C/O C. ROSE; C/O K. BRINKLEY;
C/O WHITE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, James P.
Jones, District Judges. (7:13-cv-00565-JPJ-RSB)
Submitted: September 19, 2014 Decided: September 25, 2014
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrian Nathaniel Bacon, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Adrian Nathaniel Bacon seeks to appeal the denial of
motions for summary judgment in his action filed under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-
46 (1949). The orders Bacon seeks to appeal are neither final
orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2