Filed: Sep. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6803 DAVID TILLMAN, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES CONGRESS; UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:13-ct-03288-BO) Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, S
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6803 DAVID TILLMAN, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES CONGRESS; UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:13-ct-03288-BO) Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Se..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6803
DAVID TILLMAN, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES CONGRESS; UNITED
STATES SUPREME COURT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03288-BO)
Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Tillman, III, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Tillman, III, appeals the district court’s order
dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) his complaint
filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the
record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Tillman v. United States, No. 5:13-ct-03288-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr.
30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2