Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Vicki Sampson v. Sheppard Pratt Hospital, 14-1718 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1718 Visitors: 25
Filed: Sep. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1718 VICKI SAMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHEPPARD PRATT HOSPITAL AT ELLICOTT CITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00204-WMN) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per c
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1718 VICKI SAMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHEPPARD PRATT HOSPITAL AT ELLICOTT CITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00204-WMN) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vicki Sampson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Graham Coale, Amy B. Heinrich, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Vicki Sampson appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reconsider the dismissal of her civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sampson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Sampson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. * Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * To the extent Sampson seeks to appeal the district court’s February 23, 2012, order dismissing her complaint and the court’s February 27, 2013, order denying a temporary restraining order, her appeal of those orders is untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer