Filed: Sep. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1338 PASCAL ANDRE PIERRE ETCHEBER, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; UNITED STATES, Defendants - Appellants, and DAVID ESPIE, Counter Intelligence Special Agent, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (2:13-cv-00752-JFA) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014 Before WILKINSO
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1338 PASCAL ANDRE PIERRE ETCHEBER, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; UNITED STATES, Defendants - Appellants, and DAVID ESPIE, Counter Intelligence Special Agent, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (2:13-cv-00752-JFA) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014 Before WILKINSON..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1338
PASCAL ANDRE PIERRE ETCHEBER,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; UNITED STATES,
Defendants - Appellants,
and
DAVID ESPIE, Counter Intelligence Special Agent,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.,
District Judge. (2:13-cv-00752-JFA)
Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pascal Andre Etcheber, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier
Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Pascal Andre Pierre Etcheber appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Etcheber v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, No. 2:13-cv-00752-JFA
(D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2