Filed: Oct. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1378 MALIK BEY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP, Substitute Trustees; NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-cv-01562-PWG) Submitted: September 16, 2014 Decided: October 6, 2014 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. M
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1378 MALIK BEY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP, Substitute Trustees; NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-cv-01562-PWG) Submitted: September 16, 2014 Decided: October 6, 2014 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ma..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1378
MALIK BEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP, Substitute Trustees; NEW YORK
COMMUNITY BANK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge.
(8:13-cv-01562-PWG)
Submitted: September 16, 2014 Decided: October 6, 2014
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malik Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Bizhan Beiramee, Alexander Richard
Green, MCGINNIS WUTSCHER BEIRAMEE, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland;
Craig James Franco, ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC, Reston,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Malik Bey appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his complaint alleging violations of the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692y (2012), the
Maryland Consumer Debt Collections Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law,
§§ 14-201 to -204, and the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Md.
Code Ann., Com. Law, §§ 13-101 to -501, and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP, No.
8:13-cv-01562-PWG (D. Md. Feb. 20 & Mar. 21, 2014). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2