Filed: Nov. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1714 QUAKER LANE, LP, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IVA ROBBINS; IVAN ROBBINS, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00868-LMB-IDD) Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 24, 2014 Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam op
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1714 QUAKER LANE, LP, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IVA ROBBINS; IVAN ROBBINS, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00868-LMB-IDD) Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 24, 2014 Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1714
QUAKER LANE, LP,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
IVA ROBBINS; IVAN ROBBINS,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00868-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 24, 2014
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Iva Robbins, Ivan Robbins, Appellants Pro Se. Crystal Dawn
Whalen, OFFIT KURMAN, PA, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Defendants, Iva and Ivan Robbins, seek to appeal the
district court’s orders remanding the underlying unlawful
detainer action to state court and denying their motion for
reconsideration. Defendants have also filed an application to
proceed in forma pauperis. We deny in forma pauperis status and
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Subject to exceptions not applicable here, “[a]n order
remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is
not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d)
(2012); see E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc.,
722 F.3d 574,
579-83 (4th Cir. 2013). Because the district court’s orders do
not fall within any of the exceptions provided by § 1447, the
orders are not appealable.
Accordingly, we deny Defendants’ application to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the material before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2