Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lyndell Wilson v. The Ohio River Company, a Corporation, 10982 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10982 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 03, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 375 F.2d 775 Lyndell WILSON, Appellant, v. The OHIO RIVER COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee. No. 10982. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued March 9, 1967. Decided April 3, 1967. See also D.C., 234 F. Supp. 283 ; D.C., 236 F. Supp. 96 . Harry Alan Sherman, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Chad W. Ketchum, Huntington, W. Va., on brief), for appellant. Harold R. Schmidt, Pittsburgh, Pa. (R. Gregory McNeer, Huntington, W. Va. and Anthony J. Polito, Pittsburgh, Pa., Campbell, McNeer, Woods, Bagley &
More

375 F.2d 775

Lyndell WILSON, Appellant,
v.
The OHIO RIVER COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 10982.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 9, 1967.
Decided April 3, 1967.

See also D.C., 234 F. Supp. 283; D.C., 236 F. Supp. 96.

Harry Alan Sherman, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Chad W. Ketchum, Huntington, W. Va., on brief), for appellant.

Harold R. Schmidt, Pittsburgh, Pa. (R. Gregory McNeer, Huntington, W. Va. and Anthony J. Polito, Pittsburgh, Pa., Campbell, McNeer, Woods, Bagley & Emerson, Huntington, W. Va., and Rose, Schmidt & Dixon, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, CRAVEN, Circuit Judge, and SIMONS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

In this appeal from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury, we find an adequate basis for the jury's factual determination. It was not bound to accept uncritically the plaintiff's testimonial claim.

2

We find no merit in the other contentions of trial error.

3

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer