Filed: Dec. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2085 JOSEPH CRUSSIAH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Thomas M. DiGirolamo, Magistrate Judge. (8:12-cv-02307-TMD) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jo
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2085 JOSEPH CRUSSIAH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Thomas M. DiGirolamo, Magistrate Judge. (8:12-cv-02307-TMD) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jos..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2085
JOSEPH CRUSSIAH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Thomas M. DiGirolamo, Magistrate Judge.
(8:12-cv-02307-TMD)
Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Crussiah, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Winakur Harris,
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Crussiah appeals the magistrate judge’s order
granting summary judgment to Appellee. ∗ On appeal, we confine
our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Crussiah’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,
Crussiah has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗
The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by
the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
2