Filed: Dec. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7228 KEVIN I. SHORT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden, N.B.C.I.; MS. LEGGE, Mailroom Supervisor, NBCI/WCI; LT. WILT, ARP Coordinator, NBCI; MS. ROBIN WOOLFORD, Deputy of IGO; MARY J. ROSE, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:13-cv-03176-RWT) Submitted: December 18, 2014 D
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7228 KEVIN I. SHORT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden, N.B.C.I.; MS. LEGGE, Mailroom Supervisor, NBCI/WCI; LT. WILT, ARP Coordinator, NBCI; MS. ROBIN WOOLFORD, Deputy of IGO; MARY J. ROSE, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:13-cv-03176-RWT) Submitted: December 18, 2014 De..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7228
KEVIN I. SHORT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden, N.B.C.I.; MS. LEGGE, Mailroom
Supervisor, NBCI/WCI; LT. WILT, ARP Coordinator, NBCI; MS.
ROBIN WOOLFORD, Deputy of IGO; MARY J. ROSE, Mailroom
Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
(8:13-cv-03176-RWT)
Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin I. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas E. Dernoga, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin I. Short appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Short v. Shearin, No. 8:13-cv-03176-RWT (D. Md. July
17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2