Filed: Dec. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7259 JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00744-TLW) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Lawrence Nance,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7259 JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00744-TLW) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Lawrence Nance, A..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7259
JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
KENNY ATKINSON, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (2:14-cv-00744-TLW)
Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Lawrence Nance, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Nance’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Nance v. Atkinson, No. 2:14-cv-00744-TLW
(D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2