Filed: Dec. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7076 MARSHALL LEE MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MILDRED RIVERA, Warden; SEAN ASHLINE, FS Adm; DOCTOR REED; DOCTOR ENEJE; NURSE RAINWATER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (4:13-cv-01949-TMC) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 24, 2014 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirme
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7076 MARSHALL LEE MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MILDRED RIVERA, Warden; SEAN ASHLINE, FS Adm; DOCTOR REED; DOCTOR ENEJE; NURSE RAINWATER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (4:13-cv-01949-TMC) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 24, 2014 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7076
MARSHALL LEE MITCHELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MILDRED RIVERA, Warden; SEAN ASHLINE, FS Adm; DOCTOR REED;
DOCTOR ENEJE; NURSE RAINWATER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(4:13-cv-01949-TMC)
Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 24, 2014
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marshall Lee Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier
Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marshall Lee Mitchell appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. * Mitchell v. Rivera, No. 4:13-cv-01949-TMC
(D.S.C. July 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
We grant Mitchell’s motion for leave to supplement his
informal brief, and we accept his attached supplement and
supplemental authorities. We deny as moot Mitchell’s motion to
extend the time to reply to Appellees’ responsive pleadings
because no such pleadings have been filed.
2