Filed: Jan. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7266 HERMAN LEWIS BILLUPS, f/k/a Herman Billups, Petitioner – Appellant, v. RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden, Respondent – Appellee, and KUMA J. DEBOO, Warden, FCI Gilmer, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00007-JPB-RWT) Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7266 HERMAN LEWIS BILLUPS, f/k/a Herman Billups, Petitioner – Appellant, v. RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden, Respondent – Appellee, and KUMA J. DEBOO, Warden, FCI Gilmer, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00007-JPB-RWT) Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER,..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7266
HERMAN LEWIS BILLUPS, f/k/a Herman Billups,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
KUMA J. DEBOO, Warden, FCI Gilmer,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00007-JPB-RWT)
Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herman Lewis Billups, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Herman Lewis Billups, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Billups v. Perdue, No. 2:14-cv-00007-JPB-
RWT (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 13, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2