Filed: Jan. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7332 MARK TIBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREGG HERSHBERGER, Warden; LIEUTENANT DICKENS; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; SCOTT OAKLEY, Exec. Dir.; WILLIAM E. MAYCOCK; GARY MAYNARD, Sec’y; KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden; RANDALL WATSON, Director for Programs and Services; CAPTAIN WALTER HOLMES, Defendants – Appellees, and DANIEL M. LONG, Judge, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7332 MARK TIBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREGG HERSHBERGER, Warden; LIEUTENANT DICKENS; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; SCOTT OAKLEY, Exec. Dir.; WILLIAM E. MAYCOCK; GARY MAYNARD, Sec’y; KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden; RANDALL WATSON, Director for Programs and Services; CAPTAIN WALTER HOLMES, Defendants – Appellees, and DANIEL M. LONG, Judge, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7332
MARK TIBBS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GREGG HERSHBERGER, Warden; LIEUTENANT DICKENS; J. MICHAEL
STOUFFER, Commissioner; SCOTT OAKLEY, Exec. Dir.; WILLIAM E.
MAYCOCK; GARY MAYNARD, Sec’y; KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden;
RANDALL WATSON, Director for Programs and Services; CAPTAIN
WALTER HOLMES,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
DANIEL M. LONG, Judge,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-02340-JKB)
Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Tibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Dorianne Avery Meloy, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark Tibbs appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Tibbs v. Hershberger, No. 1:13-cv-02340-JKB (D. Md. filed Aug.
8, 2014; entered Aug. 11, 2014). Tibbs’ motion for injunctive
relief is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3