Filed: Feb. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7356 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID BARREN, a/k/a James Willie Jones, a/k/a Vincent Hutchins, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per c
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7356 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID BARREN, a/k/a James Willie Jones, a/k/a Vincent Hutchins, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7356 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID BARREN, a/k/a James Willie Jones, a/k/a Vincent Hutchins, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Barren, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, Assistant United States Attorney, Seema Mittal, Charles Joseph Peters, Sr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Barren appeals the district court’s order dismissing several motions made in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Barren, No. 8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1 (D. Md. Aug. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
