Filed: Feb. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2318 SAKIMA IBAN EL BEY, a/k/a Sakima Bey, a/k/a Sakima Iban Salih El Bey, a/k/a Francis Marion Savall, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARGARET SEYMOUR, Senior Judge; BEATTIE B. ASHMORE; L. WALTER TOLLISON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-02858-SB) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: Februar
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2318 SAKIMA IBAN EL BEY, a/k/a Sakima Bey, a/k/a Sakima Iban Salih El Bey, a/k/a Francis Marion Savall, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARGARET SEYMOUR, Senior Judge; BEATTIE B. ASHMORE; L. WALTER TOLLISON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-02858-SB) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2318 SAKIMA IBAN EL BEY, a/k/a Sakima Bey, a/k/a Sakima Iban Salih El Bey, a/k/a Francis Marion Savall, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARGARET SEYMOUR, Senior Judge; BEATTIE B. ASHMORE; L. WALTER TOLLISON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-02858-SB) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sakima Iban Salih El Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sakima Iban El Bey appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil complaint in which he seeks the return of real property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. El Bey v. Seymour, No. 3:14-cv-02858-SB (D.S.C. Nov. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
