Filed: Feb. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1967 ROGER SEAWRIGHT, of Seawright PC Solutions, d/b/a Wall Decor Prints, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, d/b/a Cigaraficionado.com, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:14-cv-01326-JKB) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirme
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1967 ROGER SEAWRIGHT, of Seawright PC Solutions, d/b/a Wall Decor Prints, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, d/b/a Cigaraficionado.com, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:14-cv-01326-JKB) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1967 ROGER SEAWRIGHT, of Seawright PC Solutions, d/b/a Wall Decor Prints, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, d/b/a Cigaraficionado.com, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:14-cv-01326-JKB) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Seawright, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Zev Herbst, REED SMITH LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Roger Seawright appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint against M. Shanken Communications and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Seawright v. M. Shanken Comm., No. 1:14-cv-01326-JKB (D. Md. July 3, 2014 & filed Aug. 26, 2014; entered Aug. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
