Filed: Feb. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7633 WILLIAM T. WATTS, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNKNOWN OFFICER, of Lexington County Sheriff’s Department; UNKNOWN SLED OFFICERS; UNKNOWN US MILITARY; FBI; JOHN ETTERS; CRAIG HALL; OFFICER SHUMPERT; OFFICER SINGLETON; JAMES METTS; LEWIS MCCARTY; COMMISSIONER OF SLED, Sheriff, Head, Leader; GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY; UNITED STATES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7633 WILLIAM T. WATTS, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNKNOWN OFFICER, of Lexington County Sheriff’s Department; UNKNOWN SLED OFFICERS; UNKNOWN US MILITARY; FBI; JOHN ETTERS; CRAIG HALL; OFFICER SHUMPERT; OFFICER SINGLETON; JAMES METTS; LEWIS MCCARTY; COMMISSIONER OF SLED, Sheriff, Head, Leader; GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY; UNITED STATES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7633
WILLIAM T. WATTS, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNKNOWN OFFICER, of Lexington County Sheriff’s Department;
UNKNOWN SLED OFFICERS; UNKNOWN US MILITARY; FBI; JOHN
ETTERS; CRAIG HALL; OFFICER SHUMPERT; OFFICER SINGLETON;
JAMES METTS; LEWIS MCCARTY; COMMISSIONER OF SLED, Sheriff,
Head, Leader; GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY; UNITED STATES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-03223-TMC)
Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William T. Watts, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William T. Watts, II, appeals the district court’s
order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named
Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), as
frivolous and malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Watts v. Unknown Officer, No. 8:14-cv-03223-TMC
(D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2