Filed: Feb. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7703 LARRY ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MRS. LAUGHDIN, Record Room Supervisor; MRS. GREEN, Record Room Supervisor; MRS. REEDY, Record Room Assistant; JANE DOE, Record Room Supervisor; JANE DOE, Record Room Assistant; JANE DOE, Record Room Assistant; JANE DOE, Record Room Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Dis
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7703 LARRY ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MRS. LAUGHDIN, Record Room Supervisor; MRS. GREEN, Record Room Supervisor; MRS. REEDY, Record Room Assistant; JANE DOE, Record Room Supervisor; JANE DOE, Record Room Assistant; JANE DOE, Record Room Assistant; JANE DOE, Record Room Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Dist..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7703
LARRY ROBINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MRS. LAUGHDIN, Record Room Supervisor; MRS. GREEN, Record
Room Supervisor; MRS. REEDY, Record Room Assistant; JANE
DOE, Record Room Supervisor; JANE DOE, Record Room
Assistant; JANE DOE, Record Room Assistant; JANE DOE, Record
Room Assistant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:14-cv-00172-MSD-TEM)
Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Robinson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Robinson v. Laughdin, No. 2:14-cv-00172-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct.
17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2