Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

James Roudabush, Jr. v. Sgt. F. Mensah, 14-7827 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-7827 Visitors: 30
Filed: Feb. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7827 JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SGT. F. MENSAH; D. LAWHORNE, Sheriff; STEARNS, Chief; F. MILANO, Captain; G. HUNTER; C. M. KYLTON, USDJ; MS. ERVIN, Classification Supv.; GRAHAM, Classification Counselor; HYLTON, Director, U.S. Marshal Service; J. COREY, FPDO; A. ANDERSON, SAUSA; K. PEDERSEN, AUSA; LT. REA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Distri
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7827 JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SGT. F. MENSAH; D. LAWHORNE, Sheriff; STEARNS, Chief; F. MILANO, Captain; G. HUNTER; C. M. KYLTON, USDJ; MS. ERVIN, Classification Supv.; GRAHAM, Classification Counselor; HYLTON, Director, U.S. Marshal Service; J. COREY, FPDO; A. ANDERSON, SAUSA; K. PEDERSEN, AUSA; LT. REA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:13-cv-00646-RBS-LRL) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Lester Roudabush, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion to reopen proceedings in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Sgt. F. Mensah, No. 2:13-cv-00646-RBS-LRL (E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer