Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Harvey Johnson v. M. Cruz, 14-7490 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-7490 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7490 HARVEY R. JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. M. CRUZ, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-03347-JFA) Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 12, 2015 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harvey R. Johnson, Appellant Pro
More
                            UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                            No. 14-7490


HARVEY R. JOHNSON,

                Petitioner - Appellant,

          v.

M. CRUZ, Warden,

                Respondent - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.     Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-03347-JFA)


Submitted:   February 27, 2015            Decided:   March 12, 2015


Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Harvey R. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.      Marshall Prince, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

     Harvey R. Johnson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s    order       accepting      the    recommendation           of    the    magistrate

judge     and    denying       relief       on       his   28    U.S.C.      § 2241     (2012)

petition.        We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.     Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis,       we    affirm    for   the        reasons     stated     by    the     district

court.     Johnson v. Cruz, No. 1:13-cv-03347-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 24,

2014).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions         are   adequately          presented       in    the    materials

before this          court   and   argument          would      not   aid   the    decisional

process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED




                                                 2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer