Filed: Mar. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2275 JANE DOE, as Next Friend of Individuals Known to the Defendant as Child 1 and Child 2 in the YKND Series, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. NATHAN BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01094-MJG) Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 11, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2275 JANE DOE, as Next Friend of Individuals Known to the Defendant as Child 1 and Child 2 in the YKND Series, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. NATHAN BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01094-MJG) Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 11, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismis..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2275
JANE DOE, as Next Friend of Individuals Known to the
Defendant as Child 1 and Child 2 in the YKND Series,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
NATHAN BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District
Judge. (1:14-cv-01094-MJG)
Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 11, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathan Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Jonathan Kelly,
SILVERMAN, THOMPSON, SLUTKIN & WHITE, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathan Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying his motion to dismiss the complaint, denying
Brown’s motion to add Defendants, granting the Plaintiff’s
motion to dismiss Brown’s counterclaims, and denying
reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541,
545-46 (1949). The orders Brown seeks to appeal are neither
final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
also deny Brown’s motions for clarification of the record on
appeal and to correct the record. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2