Filed: Mar. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7572 BERNARD MCFADDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. CYNTHIA YORK, Classification Officer of Kershaw Correctional Institution; MS. CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden of KRCI; MS. L. MILLER, a/k/a Lula Miller, First Name Unknown, Lieutenant of KRCI, in their individual or personal capacities; JOHN OR JANE DOE, a/k/a Jane Doe, Clerk, US District Court; MR. J. C. GASTON, a/k/a Jannita C. Gaston, Grievance Hearing Officer; in their indiv
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7572 BERNARD MCFADDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. CYNTHIA YORK, Classification Officer of Kershaw Correctional Institution; MS. CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden of KRCI; MS. L. MILLER, a/k/a Lula Miller, First Name Unknown, Lieutenant of KRCI, in their individual or personal capacities; JOHN OR JANE DOE, a/k/a Jane Doe, Clerk, US District Court; MR. J. C. GASTON, a/k/a Jannita C. Gaston, Grievance Hearing Officer; in their indivi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7572
BERNARD MCFADDEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. CYNTHIA YORK, Classification Officer of Kershaw
Correctional Institution; MS. CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden of
KRCI; MS. L. MILLER, a/k/a Lula Miller, First Name Unknown,
Lieutenant of KRCI, in their individual or personal
capacities; JOHN OR JANE DOE, a/k/a Jane Doe, Clerk, US
District Court; MR. J. C. GASTON, a/k/a Jannita C. Gaston,
Grievance Hearing Officer; in their individual or personal
capacities,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOHN OR JANE DOES, Step 2 Grievance Hearing Officers,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (8:13-cv-02278-JMC)
Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard McFadden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Bernard McFadden appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
McFadden v. York, No. 8:13-cv-02278-JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3