Filed: Mar. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6101 MATIN AQUIL HASSAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOHN NEWHART, Sheriff, Chesapeake City Jail; VERNON L. WHITE, Lieutenant, Chesapeake City Jail, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00876-JRS) Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 17, 2015 Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6101 MATIN AQUIL HASSAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOHN NEWHART, Sheriff, Chesapeake City Jail; VERNON L. WHITE, Lieutenant, Chesapeake City Jail, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00876-JRS) Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 17, 2015 Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6101
MATIN AQUIL HASSAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JOHN NEWHART, Sheriff, Chesapeake City Jail; VERNON L.
WHITE, Lieutenant, Chesapeake City Jail,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00876-JRS)
Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 17, 2015
Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matin Aquil Hassan, Appellant Pro Se. David Brandt Oakley, POOLE
MAHONEY PC, Chesapeake, Virginia; Phillip Matthew Roberts, POOLE
MAHONEY, PC, Chesterfield, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Matin Aquil Hassan appeals the district court’s order
dismissing Hassan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for
failure to state a claim for relief. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Hassan v. Newhart,
No. 3:12-cv-00876-JRS (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2