Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Christopher Harris v. Aleta Barie, 14-7483 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-7483 Visitors: 61
Filed: Mar. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7483 CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALETA BARIE, Clerk of Court, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-22649) Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 16, 2015 Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher L. Harri
More
                              UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                              No. 14-7483


CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS,

                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

ALETA BARIE, Clerk of Court,

                Defendant - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-22649)


Submitted:   March 12, 2015                 Decided:   March 16, 2015


Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Christopher L. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Christopher L. Harris appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

his motion for leave to make a deposit in court pursuant to 28

U.S.C.     §     2014        (2012),    and   denying          his     motion     for

reconsideration.         Harris sought to pay a criminal fine imposed

by the district court in Indiana with a promissory note.                            We

have     reviewed      the    record    and   find      no     reversible       error.

Accordingly, we deny Harris’ pending motions and affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.                   Harris v. Barie, No.

1:13-cv-22649 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 15, 2014; Oct. 7, 2014).                            We

dispense       with    oral    argument   because       the    facts    and      legal

contentions      are    adequately     presented   in    the    materials       before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.



                                                                            AFFIRMED




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer