Filed: Mar. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7762 MARCUS T. MITCHELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. LESLIE FLEMING, Warden of Keen Mountain Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee, and UNKNOWN, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Ivan Darnell Davis, Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-01070-JCC-IDD) Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015 Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Se
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7762 MARCUS T. MITCHELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. LESLIE FLEMING, Warden of Keen Mountain Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee, and UNKNOWN, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Ivan Darnell Davis, Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-01070-JCC-IDD) Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015 Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Sen..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7762
MARCUS T. MITCHELL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LESLIE FLEMING, Warden of Keen Mountain Correctional Center,
Respondent - Appellee,
and
UNKNOWN,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Ivan Darnell Davis,
Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-01070-JCC-IDD)
Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus T. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marcus T. Mitchell appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)
petition for failing to comply with a court order. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Fleming, No.
1:14-cv-01070-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2014). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2