Filed: Apr. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7610 ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER PORCHER; OFFICER HOPKINS; OFFICER SOLOMON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00223-TDS-JEP) Submitted: March 27, 2015 Decided: April 6, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublis
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7610 ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER PORCHER; OFFICER HOPKINS; OFFICER SOLOMON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00223-TDS-JEP) Submitted: March 27, 2015 Decided: April 6, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublish..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7610
ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER PORCHER; OFFICER HOPKINS; OFFICER SOLOMON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00223-TDS-JEP)
Submitted: March 27, 2015 Decided: April 6, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas, III, Appellant Pro Se. William
L. Hill, James Demarest Secor, III, FRAZIER HILL & FURY, RLLP,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas, III, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Thomas v. Porcher, No. 1:12-cv-00223-TDS-JEP
(M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014). We deny Thomas’ motion to appoint
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2