Filed: Apr. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2154 MAUREEN UCHE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY HOSPICE, INC.; ROBERT WASHINGTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (8:13-cv-00878-ELH) Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: April 7, 2015 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maureen Uche, Appella
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2154 MAUREEN UCHE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY HOSPICE, INC.; ROBERT WASHINGTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (8:13-cv-00878-ELH) Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: April 7, 2015 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maureen Uche, Appellan..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2154 MAUREEN UCHE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY HOSPICE, INC.; ROBERT WASHINGTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (8:13-cv-00878-ELH) Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: April 7, 2015 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maureen Uche, Appellant Pro Se. Marc Richard Engel, Michael John Neary, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, CHARTERED, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Maureen Uche appeals the district court’s order dismissing her case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and several other orders. We have considered the claims raised in Uche’s informal brief and conclude that the district court committed no error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Uche v. Montgomery Hospice, Inc., No. 8:13-cv-00878-ELH (D. Md. Oct. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
