Filed: Apr. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6033 FRANKLIN ALMA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JENIFER WALL; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-hc-02066-FL) Submitted: March 19, 2015 Decided: April 7, 2015 Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpub
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6033 FRANKLIN ALMA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JENIFER WALL; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-hc-02066-FL) Submitted: March 19, 2015 Decided: April 7, 2015 Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpubl..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6033
FRANKLIN ALMA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JENIFER WALL; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-hc-02066-FL)
Submitted: March 19, 2015 Decided: April 7, 2015
Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Franklin Alma, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Franklin Alma, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Alma v. Wall, No. 5:14-hc-02066-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2