Filed: May 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7822 REGINALD F. MILEY-BUTLER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. VALERIE CARTER, Program Director; SCOTT BAIRD, Major/Asst. Superintendent Operations, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, District Judge. (1:14-cv-01146-AJT-JFA) Submitted: April 10, 2015 Decided: May 1, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirm
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7822 REGINALD F. MILEY-BUTLER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. VALERIE CARTER, Program Director; SCOTT BAIRD, Major/Asst. Superintendent Operations, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, District Judge. (1:14-cv-01146-AJT-JFA) Submitted: April 10, 2015 Decided: May 1, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirme..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7822
REGINALD F. MILEY-BUTLER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VALERIE CARTER, Program Director; SCOTT BAIRD, Major/Asst.
Superintendent Operations,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-01146-AJT-JFA)
Submitted: April 10, 2015 Decided: May 1, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald F. Miley-Butler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald F. Miley-Butler appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action without prejudice
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Miley-Butler v. Carter,
No. 1:14-cv-01146-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2014). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2