Filed: May 26, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6084 BELAY REDDICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAMELA JUSTICE; MARY M. MITCHELL; J. HOLLETT; JOSEPH NEAL; OSCAR ACOSTA; WANDA HARRIS; ROY LATHROP; WARREN C. HOLLAND; LEE HAMAR; S. TAYLOR; K. JOHNSON; M. CRUZ; S. LANGFORD; B. KEMP; R. CELAYA; D. COLON; D. MERCADO; J. SIMMONS; E. RAYBURN; T. MILLER; R. KELSO; S. LATHROP; T. TALPLACIDO; D. AYOTTE; M. WALKER; D. BARBARENO; E. MCLELLAN; T. GRAVES; J. STIVERS; M. STRONG; M. MOORE;
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6084 BELAY REDDICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAMELA JUSTICE; MARY M. MITCHELL; J. HOLLETT; JOSEPH NEAL; OSCAR ACOSTA; WANDA HARRIS; ROY LATHROP; WARREN C. HOLLAND; LEE HAMAR; S. TAYLOR; K. JOHNSON; M. CRUZ; S. LANGFORD; B. KEMP; R. CELAYA; D. COLON; D. MERCADO; J. SIMMONS; E. RAYBURN; T. MILLER; R. KELSO; S. LATHROP; T. TALPLACIDO; D. AYOTTE; M. WALKER; D. BARBARENO; E. MCLELLAN; T. GRAVES; J. STIVERS; M. STRONG; M. MOORE; ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6084
BELAY REDDICK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAMELA JUSTICE; MARY M. MITCHELL; J. HOLLETT; JOSEPH NEAL; OSCAR
ACOSTA; WANDA HARRIS; ROY LATHROP; WARREN C. HOLLAND; LEE HAMAR;
S. TAYLOR; K. JOHNSON; M. CRUZ; S. LANGFORD; B. KEMP; R. CELAYA;
D. COLON; D. MERCADO; J. SIMMONS; E. RAYBURN; T. MILLER; R.
KELSO; S. LATHROP; T. TALPLACIDO; D. AYOTTE; M. WALKER; D.
BARBARENO; E. MCLELLAN; T. GRAVES; J. STIVERS; M. STRONG; M.
MOORE; D. FRANKS; F. HILL; F. BROCKINGTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:13-cv-03379-DCN)
Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 26, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Belay Reddick, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Belay Reddick appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named
Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Reddick v. Justice, No. 2:13-cv-03379-DCN (D.S.C.
Jan. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2