Filed: Jun. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1038 KAREN D. JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-00870-SAG) Submitted: May 29, 2015 Decided: June 2, 2015 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen D. Jack
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1038 KAREN D. JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-00870-SAG) Submitted: May 29, 2015 Decided: June 2, 2015 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen D. Jacks..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1038
KAREN D. JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate
Judge. (1:14-cv-00870-SAG)
Submitted: May 29, 2015 Decided: June 2, 2015
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karen D. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Irene Cole, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Karen D. Jackson appeals the magistrate judge’s * order
upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Jackson’s application for
supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant
Jackson leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Jackson v. Colvin, No.
1:14-cv-00870-SAG (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
2