Filed: Jun. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2234 JOSUE ISRAEL SOTO DE LEON, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: May 15, 2015 Decided: June 8, 2015 Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hugo Cesar Castro, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Assistant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2234 JOSUE ISRAEL SOTO DE LEON, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: May 15, 2015 Decided: June 8, 2015 Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hugo Cesar Castro, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Assistant A..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2234
JOSUE ISRAEL SOTO DE LEON,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: May 15, 2015 Decided: June 8, 2015
Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hugo Cesar Castro, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Assistant Attorney General, Francis W.
Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Regina Byrd, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Josue Israel Soto De Leon, a native and citizen of
Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider.
We review the Board’s decision denying De Leon’s motion to
reconsider for abuse of discretion, Jean v. Gonzales,
435 F.3d
475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006), and may only reverse if the Board
“‘acted arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to law,’” Narine
v. Holder,
559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009) (quoting Mohammed
v. Gonzales,
400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005)). We have
reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and
find no such abuse of discretion. We therefore deny the
petition for review. See In re: Soto De Leon (B.I.A. Oct. 15,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2