Filed: Jun. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6126 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTONIO MONTANA BOYD, a/k/a Josh Poole, a/k/a Ya Yo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:09-cr-00208-FL-1) Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: June 18, 2015 Before GREGORY, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6126 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTONIO MONTANA BOYD, a/k/a Josh Poole, a/k/a Ya Yo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:09-cr-00208-FL-1) Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: June 18, 2015 Before GREGORY, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion...
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6126
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTONIO MONTANA BOYD, a/k/a Josh Poole, a/k/a Ya Yo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:09-cr-00208-FL-1)
Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: June 18, 2015
Before GREGORY, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Montana Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Aubrey West,
Assistant United States Attorney, Eric David Goulian, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Montana Boyd appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Boyd,
No. 5:09-cr-00208-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2